Any finite set of training data is consistent with an infinite number of hypothetical algorithms that could have generated it. Studies have shown that when human children learn language, they consistently favor hypotheses based on hierarchical syntactic rules without ever encountering disambiguating examples. A recent line of work has inquired as to whether common neural network architectures share this bias, finding that they do so only under special conditions: when syntactically supervised, when pre-trained on massive corpora, or when trained long past convergence. In this paper, we demonstrate, for the first time, neural network architectures that are able to generalize in human-like fashion without any of the aforementioned requirements: stack-augmented neural networks. We test three base architectures (transformer, simple RNN, LSTM) augmented with two styles of stack: the superposition stack of Joulin & Mikolov (2015) and a nondeterministic generalization of it proposed by DuSell & Chiang (2023). We find that transformers with nondeterministic stacks generalize best out of these architectures on a classical question formation task. We also propose a modification to the stack RNN architecture that improves hierarchical generalization. These results suggest that stack-augmented neural networks may be more accurate models of human language acquisition than standard architectures, serving as useful objects of psycholinguistic study. Our code is publicly available.

Attention, specifically scaled dot-product attention, has proven effective for natural language, but it does not have a mechanism for handling hierarchical patterns of arbitrary nesting depth, which limits its ability to recognize certain syntactic structures. To address this shortcoming, we propose stack attention: an attention operator that incorporates stacks, inspired by their theoretical connections to context-free languages (CFLs). We show that stack attention is analogous to standard attention, but with a latent model of syntax that requires no syntactic supervision. We propose two variants: one related to deterministic pushdown automata (PDAs) and one based on nondeterministic PDAs, which allows transformers to recognize arbitrary CFLs. We show that transformers with stack attention are very effective at learning CFLs that standard transformers struggle on, achieving strong results on a CFL with theoretically maximal parsing difficulty. We also show that stack attention is more effective at natural language modeling under a constrained parameter budget, and we include results on machine translation.

Given a collection of strings belonging to a context free grammar (CFG) and another collection of strings not belonging to the CFG, how might one infer the grammar? This is the problem of grammatical inference. Since CFGs are the languages recognized by pushdown automata (PDA), it suffices to determine the state transition rules and stack action rules of the corresponding PDA. An approach would be to train a recurrent neural network (RNN) to classify the sample data and attempt to extract these PDA rules. But neural networks are not a priori aware of the structure of a PDA and would likely require many samples to infer this structure. Furthermore, extracting the PDA rules from the RNN is nontrivial. We build a RNN specifically structured like a PDA, where weights correspond directly to the PDA rules. This requires a stack architecture that is somehow differentiable (to enable gradient-based learning) and stable (an unstable stack will show deteriorating performance with longer strings). We propose a stack architecture that is differentiable and that provably exhibits orbital stability. Using this stack, we construct a neural network that provably approximates a PDA for strings of arbitrary length. Moreover, our model and method of proof can easily be generalized to other state machines, such as a Turing Machine.